as family and household - 2649 Words

If the family exists (as Murdock says it does universally), then it must be performing some function(s) or fulfilling some purpose(s). A number of functionalist sociologists have presented accounts of the way in which this happens. GP Murdock Four essential functions of the family Murdock argues that the family is a universal institution (it exists everywhere) that performs four major functions Stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same partner, preventing the social disruption caused by sexual free-for-all. Reproduction of the next generation, without which society would not be able to continue. Socialisation of the young into societys shared norms and values. Meeting its members economic needs, such as shelter and food. Talcott†¦show more content†¦The ideological state apparatus control at the level of consciousness the socialisation of norms and values that maintain the status quo, through religion, the media and so on. These two mechanisms form a web or comple x pattern of interrelationships controlling the individual through physical force or ideology. This distinction reflects the ideas of Gramsci (1971), who claims that ideological control is more secure than repressive control in the long term, but if ideology breaks down then repression will be resorted to as capitalisms last hope. The family can be seen as serving the functions of an ideological state apparatus by socialising both pro-capitalist ideology and its own familiar ideology in order to maintain such family patterns over time. For example the family socialises its members into accepting gender roles, into accepting that it is natural for men and women to get married and engage in separate roles and jobs in the home an attitude that is passed down from generation to generation. For feminists such a family ideology supports patriarchy since it suggests that men and women should have different roles in the family and society roles that lead to the subordination of women to me n. Evaluation of the Marxist approach Marxist views of the family follow logically from Marxist theory. If, for example, the family provides emotional support for workers, then this helps them to accept the injustices of the capitalist system.Show MoreRelatedFamily and Household2017 Words   |  9 Pagesthe subject which looks at the social world around us, how the social world works and how it effects and influences our daily lives. People tend to accept the social arrangements in which they grew up as normal or too complicated to understand. The family is the natural way to bring up children and schools are the normal places for children to learn. For most people the social world is just there, challenging their lives, they cannot change it and it is not really worth while trying to understand itRead More Family and Household Essay973 Words   |  4 Pages Family and Household nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The word family comes from the Latin word familia which means household. This seems to be fitting since they both seem synonymous. In the dictionary the definition of family is a group of individuals living under one roof and usually under one head or a group of persons of common ancestry. The definition of household is those who dwell under the same roof and compose a family or a social unit comprised of those living together in the same dwellingRead MoreMy Family, The, And Conservative Household1040 Words   |  5 PagesThere are many factors that point to me being raised in a stereotypical, white, and conservative household. My family is moderately wealthy, we are republicans, live in the suburbs, and are extremely close. The only thing that separated us from the conventional white upper middle class family was that my parents raised me to purely believe in science. If it wasn’t proven by tests and observations it wasn’t real. We would judg e those who believed in some higher being that magically brought the worldRead MoreFamilies and Household By Atis Stafeckis Essay1198 Words   |  5 PagesFamilies and Household By Atis Stafeckis The role of the family within our society has always been hard to explain. Functionalist theorists like George Murdock (1949) and Talcott Parsons (1959) considers the family a mechanism that exists to complement societal needs for new generations with identical norms and values. Marxists like Engels and Zeretsky have a narrower viewpoint on the family in terms of societal use. They consider the family to be a more oppressive force that teaches the young aboutRead MoreEssay about Family and Household Tasks1562 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction According to Wikipedia.com, in human context, a family (from Latin: familia) is a group of people affiliated by consanguinity, affinity, or co-residence. In most societies it is the principal institution for the socialization of children. Extended from the human family unit by biological-cultural affinity, marriage, economy, culture, tradition, honour, and friendship are concepts of family that are physical and metaphorical, or that grow increasingly inclusive extending to communityRead MoreComparison of the Roles of Families and Households in Politics1122 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction to Political Theory A Comparison of the Roles of Families and Households in Politics Plato and Aristotle number among the greatest philosophers throughout history. Plato wrote the Republic to explore the idea of justice and whether or not the â€Å"just† man could be happier than the â€Å"unjust† man could. Plato cycles through many theories and ideas by creating an imaginary city to illustrate many of his ideas. Aristotle wrote Politics intending to guide and influence rulers and statesmenRead MoreDomestic Violence Is The Violent Confrontation Within A Family Household1195 Words   |  5 PagesValentina Marmol Women’s Literature Ms. Bruno 6 June 2016 Domestic Violence Domestic violence is the violent confrontation within a family household including physical abuse or sexual assault. This assault usually occurs in former spouses or relationships. Approximately four million women have faced sexual assault from a significant other in our world today. Even though domestic violence is defined as the physical abuse inflicted by someone onto another individual, but it also relatesRead MoreA Study Of The Economic Forecasting Of New One Family Households1758 Words   |  8 PagesA STUDY OF THE ECONOMIC FORECASTING OF NEW ONE FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS SOLD IN THE US – AN ANALYSIS Context and Objective of the Analysis The US housing industry has witnessed a downward trend post 2005 due to deteriorating macroeconomic conditions in the United States. The steep decline in the last 5 years has led to investigations on the future of the industry and understands the way forward for the industry. The report answers the following questions: How long is the fall in the industry going toRead MoreExamine the Reasons for the Increase in Uk Family and Household Diversity in the Last 40 Years2165 Words   |  9 Pages. Examine the reasons for the increase in family and household diversity in the last 40 years (24 marks, 10 A01, 14 A02) Family and household diversity is the change in patterns among the various family and household types that exist because of factors such as secularisation, changes to legislation, changes in womens position, changing attitudes In the past 40 years the family structure within the UK has changed quite dramaticallyRead MoreThe Importance Of A Family Of Four Household Budgets On A Two Person New Mexico Minimum Wage1446 Words   |  6 Pagesto manage a family of four household budgets on a two-person New Mexico minimum wage income of $7.50 per hour. My paper has many purposes as to why I have written it, which will be listed and further explained throughout its entirety. The first purpose is to demonstrate the ways individuals have to seek out in both creating and maintaining a family budget. Secondly, is to show the difficulties that arise in keeping family household budgets and the temporary or permanent ways families find and have

Pregnancy and Decisions Women Free Essays

Most people think differently, but there are plenty of reasons as to why it should be legal. Women should be able to get an abortion because they have their own choice of keeping their baby or not. What if a woman were to get raped? If abortion is made illegal, women would go back to the clothes hanger method and many women would die. We will write a custom essay sample on Pregnancy and Decisions Women or any similar topic only for you Order Now If I were to have a baby at my age right now, would choose to get an abortion. In my culture, parents are all about studying and becoming successful. If I got pregnant and had a baby, my whole future would be ruined. Having a baby at a young age could ruin so many things such as school and work. I wouldn’t be able to get a job/career due to the fact that I’m going to have to carry a newborn around. Would not be able to attend school because once again, have to take care of a newborn baby. In my culture, we are all about having our studies as our first priority. My parents wouldn’t even let me have a boyfriend during my early years of high school. Imagine how hey would feel if I would have gotten pregnant. In my culture, we believe that if you have enough reason to get an abortion, then you should get one. My mother got an abortion before she had me. This was around the time when my grandpa got diagnosed with cancer, so it was a rough time for her. She also recently gave birth to my older sister, and she just wasn’t ready to have another baby at that time. Two of my cousins also got abortions when they were in their teenager years. Unfortunately, they were being careless and ended up getting pregnant. Both of them actually didn’t tell their moms that they got pregnant, and got an abortion on their own. They already knew what would happen if their mom’s found out, so they did it without her knowing to keep her sane. Women have enough reason to get an abortion, and it shouldn’t be legalized. Would ask my mom if she would give her baby up for adoption, and she told me she wouldn’t want anyone else to have her baby. She would have to go thru the heartache of knowing that someone else loves and takes care of her own baby. Of course having an abortion is difficult too. My mom tells me she still thinks about how different her life would be if she kept that baby. But she says that it was one of the best routes she could take. I was reading a lot Of articles, essays, and other things that supported my position on keeping abortion legal. Most of them all said the same thing. Women should have their own choice whether or not they should be allowed to get an abortion or not. For one, they could have been raped. Why would any woman want to keep a baby when rape impregnated them? Giving up the baby for adoption wouldn’t even be an option in their head for them. She would be carrying the rapists baby for almost a full 9 months, and the thought of the incident would never go away. Feel like for a woman to move in that situation is if she got an abortion and just started over. A lot of these sources also included how women or girls get abortions due to incest. I don’t think anyone in their family got pregnant by someone else in the family. That’s just wrong. It’s not illegal to have a baby with a family member, but it’s very looked down upon. Babies from incest situations are also more likely to be born with Down syndrome. Abortion would probably be very considerable in these situations. Abortion should be kept legal. One in three women gets an abortion by the time they are age 45. If the percentage of woman getting an abortion is so high, why should it become illegal? There are about 1. 1 million U. S. Abortions each year. Nearly 1 in 4 pregnancies end in abortion as well. If abortion becomes illegal, it’s not like women are going to keep their babies. Instead, they II find another way to get an abortion. They’ll go back to the clothes hanger way, which was used, back in the old days. Women would die all the time using that way because it is not safe. The procedures done today for abortion are safe. After all the research read, still think abortion should be kept legal. There are plenty of reasons as to why its okay to get one. My culture has made me believe that abortion shouldn’t be something to avoid. I don’t believe that abortion is bad. I believe it’s very helpful. Many women in this world get abortions. It should stay legal so everyone can get proper procedures and care. How to cite Pregnancy and Decisions Women, Papers

Privacy Katz Vs. United States Essay Example For Students

Privacy: Katz Vs. United States Essay Katz V. The United States The petitioner Mr. Katz was arrested for illegalgambling, he had been gambling over a public phone. The FBI attachedan electronic recorder onto the outside of the public phone booth. Thestate courts claimed this to be legal because the recording device was onthe outside of the phone and the FBI never entered the booth. TheSupreme Court Ruled in the favor of Katz. They stated that the FourthAmendment allowed for the protection of a person and not just a person’sproperty against illegal searches. The Fourth Amendment written in 1791 states, The right of thepeople to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, againstunreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and nowarrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath oraffirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and thepersons or things to be seized (Galloway 214). The court was unsure onweather or not they should consider a public telephone booth as an areaprotected by the fourth amendment. The court did state that: The Fourth Amendment protects people,not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in hisown home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. Butwhat he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to thepublic, may be constitutionally protected. Searches conducted without warrants have been held unlawfulnotwithstanding facts unquestionably showing probable cause, for theConstitution requires that the deliberate impartial judgment of a judicialofficer be interposed between the citizen and the police (Maddex 201). The FBI agents found out the days and times he would use the payphone. The FBI attached a tape recorder to the outside of the telephonebooth. The FBI recorded him using the phone six different times, all sixconversations were around three minutes long. They made sure that theyonly recorded him and not anyone else’s conversations. Katz lost thecase all the way up to the Supreme Court because the state courts andthe Court of Appeals said there was no amendment violation since therewas â€Å"no physical entrance into the area occupied by the petitioner (Hall482).† The Constitutional Fourth Amendment was looked at and analyzedvery carefully and the Supreme Court decided in favor of Katz with aseven to one v ote. Strong arguments were brought to the stand, theGovernments eavesdropping violated the privacy of Katz. â€Å"The FourthAmendment governs not only the seizure of tangible items but extends aswell the recording of oral statements (Katzen 1).† The surveillance in thiscase could have been legal by the constitution, but it was not part of thewarrant issued. Warrants are very valuable to make everything stated in the fourthamendment legal. The telephone booth was made of glass so he wasvisible to the public, but he did not enter the booth so no one could seehim, he entered the booth so no one could hear him. A person in atelephone booth is under protection of the Fourth Amendment, One whooccupies it, shuts the door behind him, and pays the toll that permits himto place a call is surly entitled to assume that the words he utters into themouthpiece will not be broadcasted to the world. To read the constitution more narrowly is to ignore the vital role thatthe public telephone ha s to come to play in private communication(Katzen 2). But with all this evidence it was still fought that thesurveillance method they used involved no physical penetration into thetelephone booth. The Fourth Amendment was thought to limit onlysearches and seizures of tangible property. The decision of the court was seven to one and Justice Marshalltook no part in the decision of the case. Justice Stewart concurred in hisspeech that, these considerations do not vanish when the search inquestion is transferred from the setting of a home, an office, or a hotelroom to that of a telephone booth. Wherever a man may be, he is entitledto know that he will remain free from unreasonable searches and seizures(Katzen 4). Justice Stewart’s feelings on the case were that the use ofelectronic surveillance should be regulated. He thinks permission shouldbe granted for the use of electronic surveillance. Justice Douglas, withwhom Justice Brennan joined, concurred that â€Å"The Fourth Amendm entdraws no lines between various substantive offenses. The arrests incases of hot pursuit and the arrests on visible or other evidence ofprobable cause cut across the board and are not peculiar to any kind ofcrime (Galloway 216). † Justice Harlan concurred that like a home atelephone booth has its privacy. And the intrusion into a place that isprivate is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Also, warrants are veryimportant in legal procedures of the court and must be followed through. Justice White Concurred, I agree that the official surveillance ofpetitioner’s telephone conversations in a public booth must be subjectedto the test of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment the particularsurveillance undertaken was unreasonable absent a warrant properlyauthorizing it (Hall 482). Justice Fortas and Justice Douglas concurred together and saidthat the fourth amendment should be revised for todays technology. Although the right of the fourth amendment has come up allot l ike theOsborn V. United States case. Now it is time to adjust and start bysaying that the FBI â€Å"violated the privacy upon which the petitionerjustifiably relied while using the telephone booth (Levy 1097)†. .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .postImageUrl , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:hover , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:visited , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:active { border:0!important; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:active , .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6 .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf75137351636a1f66dbe52fd863eb6c6:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Dress Code EssayJustice Black dissented, he could not concur because he could notmake the amendment say what it didn’t know when it was written, â€Å"I willnot distort the words of the amendment in order to keep the constitutionup to date (Katzen 15).† He believes that privacy is that only explained inthe fourth Amendment and no general right is granted, by the amendmentso as to give this court the unlimited power to hold unconstitutionaleverything which affects privacythe framersdid not intend to grant thiscourt such omnipotent lawmaking authority as thatfor these reasons Irespectfully dissent(Katzen 15). After this case the court made somerequirements for electronic eavesdropping. Most of them were put in theOmnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. There are strictrequirements for electronic surveillance. Warrants now have to bespecified for the use of electronic devices. BibliographyWorks Cited Galloway, John, (ed.) The Supreme Court and The Rights of TheAccused. New York: Facts on File, 1973. Hall, Kermit. The Oxford Companion to The Supreme Court of TheUnited States. New York: Oxford, 1992. Katzen, Sally. â€Å"Katz V. United States†. FedWorld/FLITE SupremeCourt Decisions Homepage. 24 Sep. 1997. Online. http://www.fedworld.gov. Levy, Leonard, (ed.) Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan, 1986. Maddex, James, Jr. Constitutional Law: Cases and Comments. St. Paul: West, 1979. Legal Issues